Independent Research · Global Dialogue · Public Policy

Facts, Sources and Versions: The Institute’s Content Production and Citation Standards (Consultation Draft)

A research institution’s credibility rests on verifiable content. The Institute has drafted content production and citation standards (v0.9) for public consultation: separating fact from opinion, traceable sources, checkable versions and documented corrections.

Introduction

In a highly fragmented information environment, a research institution’s public value depends on whether it deserves to be trusted. Trust does not come from self-declaration but from reproducible ways of working. The Institute has therefore drafted content production and citation standards as a shared working baseline for the editorial office and researchers, now open for public consultation (v0.9).

1. Separating fact, quotation and analysis

  • Statements of fact: label verifiable sources; unverified claims must not appear as facts.
  • Quotations: name the speaker, setting and context; do not trim the meaning.
  • Analysis and opinion: clearly mark as the author’s or editorial office’s judgement, never mixed into facts.
  • Uncertainty: use qualifiers such as “according to currently available public materials” or “yet to be verified” rather than vagueness.

2. Sources and traceability

  • Public materials are cited with source and access date; non-public materials require a statement of how they were obtained and the limits of their use.
  • Data and statistics: label definitions, years and original publisher; secondary citations must be traced back to the primary source.
  • The boundary between institutional positions and researchers’ individual views is stated at the end of the text or in the author line.

3. Versions, updates and corrections

  • Formal content carries a version number; updates keep a version record and summary on the same page.
  • When factual errors are found, correct them prominently on the original page and leave a record; do not silently rewrite history.
  • When republishing or citing our content, we recommend retaining version and source so readers can trace it.

Consultation

This standard is currently a consultation draft; colleagues and readers are welcome to propose revisions to the clauses above. Channel: the Institute’s contact page; the consultation runs for thirty days from publication of this notice. We will publish the formal version after consolidating comments and archive the differences between versions.

Sources and version: this is a notice of the Institute; the standard text was drafted by the editorial office; version v0.9 consultation draft (2026-09).

WCI

About the author and editorial note

Author information is maintained through the account and editorial workflow. Published articles should state the author's affiliation, research field, disclosures of interest and any corrections.

ARTICLE INFO

Reading note

News, institutional updates and researchers' commentary carry different labels. Facts, quotations and judgements in articles are verified separately in the editorial workflow.

  • Publication date and author
  • Sources and links
  • Related research and series
  • Corrections and version history